TBCblog

Comprehensive coverage of the Texas Business Court

Operated by

Reese Marketos LLP

Dallas, Texas  ·  Complex Commercial Litigation

← The Bench
Portrait of Hon. Patrick K. Sweeten

Hon. Patrick K. Sweeten

Judge · Seat 3B

Texas Business Court · Third Business Court Division (Austin)

Biography

Patrick K. Sweeten of Austin was appointed to the Texas Business Court—Third Division by Governor Abbott. He is a seasoned trial lawyer with over 27 years of experience litigating in federal and state court, both plaintiff and defense side, including as lead counsel in pharmaceutical, securities, multi-district litigation, voting rights litigation, and deceptive trade practices and common law fraud actions. Previously, he served as the Deputy Attorney General for Special Litigation and Chief of the Special Litigation Unit for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. While at the Office of Attorney General, he built a new division, oversaw more than a dozen large trial teams managing complex litigation impacting the State of Texas, and secured well over a quarter of a billion dollars in settlements and recoveries. He also served as the state’s lead counsel in defense of the 2014, 2017, and 2022 rounds of redistricting litigation, and in 2018 successfully defended the state against challenges to its century-old method of electing Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals judges statewide. He also successfully defended the State in approximately ten federal lawsuits seeking judicial modification of Texas election laws prior to the November 2020 election. Before his service with the Texas Attorney General, he was an associate and shareholder for close to a decade at Delano Law Offices, L.L.C. in Springfield, Illinois. Sweeten received a Bachelor of Arts from UT Austin and a Juris Doctor from St. Mary’s University School of Law.

Source: txcourts.gov

Opinions by Judge Sweeten (1)

Qualified Transaction ×
2026 Tex. Bus. 35 Jurisdiction & Remand May 29, 2026

Employment Discrimination Claims Fall Outside Business Court's 'Internal Affairs' Jurisdiction

In Brown v. Exxon Mobil, the Business Court remanded a Texas Labor Code Section 21.051 race discrimination claim, holding that employment termination disputes—even involving executive compensation and RSUs—do not constitute actions regarding an organization's "internal affairs" under Section 25A.004(b)(2) or arise from a "qualified transaction" under Section 25A.004(d)(1). Judge Sweeten's opinion establishes that the Business Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over statutory employment discrimination claims despite their connection to corporate governance structures and equity-based compensation.

Subject-Matter Jurisdiction Removal & Remand Section 25A.004 Internal Affairs Employment Discrimination Opinion PDF ↓