Rule 91a Dismissal Standards Applied to Veil Piercing and Individual Liability Claims in Acquisition Dispute

In Lensabl, Inc. v. RBH SPE One, LLC, the Texas Business Court's Eighth Division granted in part and denied in part a Rule 91a motion to dismiss, holding that fraud claims against an individual principal were adequately pleaded but dismissing breach-of-contract and veil-piercing claims for failure to state legally cognizable claims. The November 5, 2025 memorandum opinion addresses the pleading standards required to survive dismissal in a dispute arising from a $28.9 million acquisition agreement.