Business Court Interprets 'Responsible Third Party' and 'Harm for Which Recovery Is Sought' Under Chapter 33

In Preston Hollow Capital v. Truist Bank, the Texas Business Court interpreted Civil Practice & Remedies Code Chapter 33's definition of "responsible third party," focusing on the statutory phrase "the harm for which recovery of damages is sought." Judge Whitehill's memorandum opinion addresses how this language determines which non-parties may be designated as responsible third parties in proportionate responsibility disputes.