We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Attempting to reconnect
Fifteenth Court of Appeals Denies Mandamus Relief in Socket Solutions Merger Successor Dispute
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied mandamus relief to Socket Solutions, LLC, as successor by merger to SS Newco-1 LLC, in an original proceeding challenging a ruling from Business Court Division 11B of Harris County. The per curiam memorandum opinion provides no reasoning for the denial, leaving the underlying Business Court order intact.
Fifteenth Court of Appeals Denies Mandamus Relief in Socket Solutions, Lifting Administrative Stay on Business Court Proceedings
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied Socket Solutions, LLC's petition for writ of mandamus in an original proceeding arising from Business Court Division 11B of Harris County, dismissing the relator's emergency temporary relief request as moot and lifting an administrative stay that had been in place since May 15, 2026. The terse memorandum opinion provides no substantive analysis, offering no insight into the nature of the dispute or the grounds for denial.
Fifteenth Court of Appeals Denies Mandamus Challenging Business Court Order in Foundation Dispute
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied a mandamus petition filed by three Highland foundations seeking to overturn a September 18, 2025 order issued by Judge William Whitehill of Business Court Division 1B in Dallas County. The per curiam opinion, issued by a panel consisting of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Field and Farris, held that relators failed to establish entitlement to mandamus relief in their dispute with Mark Patrick and several charitable foundation entities.
Fifteenth Court of Appeals Denies Mandamus Challenging Business Court Trial Setting in Minerals Dispute
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied a mandamus petition filed by Nicholas Kreines, David P. Ryan, and Liberty Mineral Partners LLC seeking to set aside Business Court Division 3B Judge Patrick K. Sweeten's January 29, 2026 order in ES3 Minerals, LLC v. Kreines. The court held that relators failed to establish entitlement to mandamus relief and denied their emergency motion to stay trial commencement.
Business Court Retains Authority to Reconsider Remand After Plaintiff Amends to Eliminate Jurisdictional Claims
In In re ColossusBets Limited, the Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied mandamus relief to defendants challenging the Business Court's remand order after plaintiff Jerry Reed amended his lottery-rigging claims to eliminate all allegations implicating the court's statutory jurisdiction over internal affairs and governance. The court framed the central issue as whether removal to the Business Court operates as a "one-way door" that prevents reconsideration even when a plaintiff eliminates all jurisdictional predicates through amended pleadings.
Chief Justice Brister
Fifteenth Court of Appeals Denies Mandamus Challenging Business Court Discovery Order in Commercial Real Estate Finance Dispute
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied a mandamus petition filed by Silver Star Properties REIT, Inc. and three affiliated LLCs seeking to overturn an August 11, 2025 order by Judge Brian Stagner of Business Court Division 8B in Tarrant County. The court held that relators failed to establish entitlement to mandamus relief and denied their accompanying emergency stay motion, leaving Judge Stagner's order intact.
Fifteenth Court Holds 'Action' Means Entire Lawsuit, Not Individual Claims, for Business Court Removal Eligibility
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied mandamus relief to relators seeking to remove derivative claims filed in December 2024 from a divorce action commenced in July 2024, holding that the term "civil action" in the Business Court Act's effective-date provision refers to the entire lawsuit—not individual claims added later—and thus the Act does not apply to any part of a case filed before September 1, 2024. The decision reinforces In re ETC Field Services and rejects arguments that later-added commercial claims could be severed and removed as a separate "action."
Amended Petition Adding Publicly Traded Party After September 1, 2024 Does Not 'Commence' New Action for Business Court Jurisdiction
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied mandamus relief to Kimco entities seeking to keep their case in the Business Court after being added as defendants via third-amended petition in September 2024, holding that a civil action 'commences' when originally filed, not when an amended petition adds a publicly traded company. The court rejected relators' argument that adding a publicly traded defendant after the September 1, 2024 effective date triggers Business Court jurisdiction, reaffirming its holding in In re ETC Field Services that removal or amendment does not commence a new civil action.
Removal Statute Does Not Apply to Pre-Effective Date Cases: Business Court Lacked Authority to Accept 2017-Filed Action
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied mandamus relief in In re ETC Field Services, holding that the Business Court properly remanded a 2017-filed breach of contract action because HB 19's removal provisions apply only to "civil actions commenced on or after September 1, 2024"—and removal transfers rather than commences an action. The court rejected ETC's attempt to remove a seven-year-old case just months before trial, establishing that the Legislature's choice of "commenced" forecloses removal of cases filed in district court before the Business Court's creation.
Mandamus Denied in Challenge to Business Court's Remand of Pre-Effective-Date Case
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals denied Synergy Global Outsourcing's mandamus petition challenging the Business Court's remand order, leaving in place the trial court's determination that it lacked jurisdiction over a case filed before the September 1, 2024 effective date. The brief memorandum opinion relies entirely on the court's reasoning in a companion case decided the same day, In re ETC Field Services, LLC.