TBCblog

Comprehensive coverage of the Texas Business Court

Operated by

Reese Marketos LLP

Dallas, Texas  ·  Complex Commercial Litigation

Home › Cases › Hinds v. Sandman Offshore

Hinds v. Sandman Offshore

Texas Business Court, 11th Division 26-BC11A-0053 active

Analysis

Exculpatory Clauses in LLC Agreements Can Eliminate Most Managerial Fiduciary Duties Under Rule 91a

In Hinds v. Sandman Offshore, Division 11 granted partial Rule 91a dismissal of fiduciary duty claims against an LLC manager where the company agreement eliminated all managerial fiduciary duties except those "expressly set forth" in the agreement, preserving only duties not to engage in gross negligence, willful misconduct, or breach. The court also held that LLC voting rights are not tangible personal property supporting conversion claims and that parties to a relationship cannot tortiously interfere with that same relationship.

Joel Reese  |  Sep 30, 2026
Oil & Gas Fiduciary Duty Rule 91a Company Agreement Section 101.401

Rule 91a Does Not Require Dismissal of Fraud-by-Nondisclosure, Tortious Interference, or Aiding-and-Abetting Claims Where Pleadings Allege Sufficient Facts

In Hinds v. Sandman Offshore, the Texas Business Court denied Rule 91a motions to dismiss fraud-by-nondisclosure, tortious-interference, civil-conspiracy, and knowing-participation claims arising from alleged self-dealing by a co-manager who recommended his own drilling company without disclosure. The court held that inaction constitutes adequate reliance for fraud claims and declined to hold that established Texas law precludes a viable aiding-and-abetting claim under Rule 91a's dismissal standard.

Joel Reese  |  Sep 30, 2026
Oil & Gas Rule 91a Notice Pleading Aiding and Abetting Fraud by Nondisclosure